Navigate to [https://chatgpt.com/?model=gpt-4o](https://chatgpt.com/?model=gpt-4o)

In this guide, I will compare the calculated values for diameter and pressure drop from two separate line sizing calculations, using ChatGPT to analyze and contrast the results.

Enter this prompt:\
"I have an Excel file and a text-based file containing line-specific data for pipe diameters and pressure drops. Extract the following:

Line names (e.g., 'Oil-Water Mixture Entry Line').\
Pipe diameters (in mm, convert to this unit if needed) and pressure drops (in Pa) from both the Excel and text-based files.\
Organize the data into a table with columns:\
Line\
Pipe Diameter (Text-Based)\
Pipe Diameter (Excel-Based)\
Pressure Drop (Text-Based)\
Pressure Drop (Excel-Based).\
Put the line names in rows.\
Ensure all values are properly aligned and all values for each parameter has the same unit"\
\
The goal is to:

1. **Extract Key Data**: Gather line-specific data for pipe diameters and pressure drops from both files.
2. **Standardize Units**: Ensure all diameters are in millimeters (mm) and all pressure drops are in Pascals (Pa).
3. **Organize Data**: Create a clear, tabular representation for easy comparison and analysis

After reviewing, enter this prompt to create clear, labeled visual representations of two key parameters (pipe diameter and pressure drop) for direct comparison between the text-based and Excel-derived data:\
\
"Using the table, create two line graphs for comparison:

Pipe Diameter Comparison: Show the pipe diameters from the text-based and Excel files for each line. Use the line names on the x-axis and pipe diameters (in mm) on the y-axis.\
Pressure Drop Comparison: Show the pressure drops from the text-based and Excel files for each line. Use the line names on the x-axis and pressure drops (in Pa) on the y-axis.\
Ensure the graphs are clear and labeled."

You can then instruct ChatGPT to create an analysis on the discrepancies of the two calculations.\
\
"Examine the original documents.  Create an analysis that detail the cause of the discrepancies in the graphs"

Flow Rate, Velocity, and Pipe Lengths: Differences in flow rates, average velocities, or line lengths can directly affect the calculated diameters and pressure drops. These need to be cross-checked between the Excel file and the text-based document.

Verify Inputs: Ensure consistent assumptions for flow rate, velocity, and fluid properties.

To analyze the discrepancies observed in the graphs, I'll examine the original documents (Excel and text-based files) for potential differences in inputs, assumptions, or calculation methodologies. Here are the key steps in the analysis:

1. Reviewing Inputs and Assumptions
Flow Rate, Velocity, and Pipe Lengths: Differences in flow rates, average velocities, or line lengths can directly affect the calculated diameters and pressure drops. These need to be cross-checked between the Excel file and the text-based document.
Material Properties: Inputs like pipe roughness, fluid density, and viscosity can significantly influence friction factor calculations, which in turn affect pressure drops.
2. Calculation Methodologies
Pipe Diameter Calculation: The formula used for pipe diameter involves flow rate and velocity. If velocity or flow rate assumptions differ between the documents, the resulting diameters will also differ.
Pressure Drop Calculation: Pressure drop depends on parameters like pipe diameter, flow rate, density, viscosity, and friction factor. A discrepancy in any of these inputs or the Darcy-Weisbach equation could cause variations.
3. Possible Causes of Discrepancies

Based on the graphs and documents:

Pipe Diameters: The Excel-based pipe diameters are consistently larger than the text-based values for several lines. This might indicate:
Higher flow rates or lower assumed velocities in the Excel file.
Differences in the use of constants or unit conversions.
Pressure Drops: Text-based pressure drops are higher in most cases. Possible reasons:
Smaller pipe diameters in the text file result in higher velocity, increasing pressure drops (proportional to 
𝑣
2
v
2
).
Assumptions about fluid properties, like higher density or viscosity, in the text file.
Differences in the friction factor calculation methodology.
4. Recommended Actions
Verify Inputs: Ensure consistent assumptions for flow rate, velocity, and fluid properties.
Cross-check Formulas: Align calculation methodologies (e.g., check how Darcy-Weisbach

Subscribe to our Youtube Channel and Udemy Course to learn more about using AI in your engineering workflow!

Chatgpt

This guide provides a step-by-step approach to leveraging ChatGPT for effectively comparing two data sets, specifically focusing on pipe diameters and pressure drops from different file formats. It emphasizes the importance of extracting and standardizing key data, organizing it into a clear table, and visualizing the results through graphs for better analysis. By following this guide, users can gain insights into discrepancies between calculations, enhancing their data analysis skills in engineering contexts. Overall, it is a valuable resource for anyone looking to integrate AI tools into their workflow for more efficient data comparison.

How to compare two data sets using ChatGPT